Print
E-mail
Find out which devices fall within the cleared claims for sterility – Check out our interactive guide.
Deadly pathogens have a potent enemy:
The ASP GLOSAIR™ Area Decontamination Solution
ASP GLOSAIR™ Area Decontamination Solution:
Controlling Environmental HAIs
Safe. Effective. Convenient. The GLOSAIR™ Area Decontamination solution broadens ASP's portfolio of infection prevention solutions. Designed for decontaminating surfaces in environments such hospitals, healthcare, commercial and industrial facilities. GLOSAIR™ Area Decontamination solutions consistently protect your environment against HAI.
Safe
- Low concentration of 5%-6% hydrogen peroxide solution reduces microbial load without leaving toxic residues
- Non-corrosive and biodegradable solution
- Decontamination cycle can be run by remote control
Effective
- A mist of H2O2 is more effective than 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution in eradicating C. difficile spores[1]
- H2O2 mist is effective at reducing C. difficile in high-risk clinical areas[2]
- Decontamination with H2O2 is effective in eliminating MRSA[3]
Convenient
- Transportable unit for mobility across your facility
- Easy programming and operation
- Full tracking and traceability.
Learn more about GLOSAIR™ Area Decontamination Solutions
1Barbut F, Menuet D, Verachten M, Girou E. Comparison of the efficacy of hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system and sodium hypochlorite solution for eradication of Clostridium difficile spores. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30:507-514
2Boyce JM, Havill NL, Otter JA, et al. Impact of hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination on Clostridium difficile environmental contamination and transmission in a healthcare setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:723-729
3French GL, Otter JA, Shannon KP, Adams NMT, Watling D, Parks MJ. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. J Hosp Infect. 2004;57:31-37
